A comparison between the new MacBook Pro and Surface Book
terms of performance but is it actually achieve that? It is no surprise to learn that this question is difficult to answer because of the many variables that appear when conducting performance tests for each of these Alhessobn, PCWorld site has tried to make a comparison between these two Alhessobn faced difficulties in reaching a clear answer.
The way was best to make a comparison accurate, according to the site by placing the Retina MacBook Pro 13 processor Intel Broadwell Core i5-5752U and graphics Iris 6100 and RAM 8 GB system OS X El Capitan run in the face of Surface Book processor Intel Skylake Core i5-6300U and graphics GeForce and random access memory 8 GB system Windows 10.
After a number of performance tests of the site found that the Surface Book was not able to compete with the speed of the MacBook, and does this mean for many users that claims Microsoft void on the Surface Book and it is faster than twice the MacBook Pro but PCWorld has decided to take a look deeper in terms of unit graphics processing.
As is clear, the graphics side, which is characterized by the Surface Book, which can be seen from the performance tests for both Alhessobn on the 2013 version of the game Tomb Raider:
Site on this matter has been added:
"I do not relate to graphics processing unit games, but also to play a role in other applications that need the highest graphics. For example, users can CAD / CAM used as that of other professional applications will benefit greatly from this graphics as well."
0 comments:
Post a Comment